Legal Opinion

Thompson v. KING FEED & NUTRITION SERVICE

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 16, 2003No. 48419-2-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

70 P.3d 972 (2003)

117 Wash.App. 260

Glenn and Janice THOMPSON, husband and wife, Respondents,

v.

KING FEED & NUTRITION SERVICE, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant.

No. 48419-2-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

June 16, 2003.

Theodore H. Millan, Hackett Beecher & Hart, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Nigel S. Malden, Davies Pearson P.C., Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

PUBLISHED IN PART

COX, A.C.J.

King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc. appeals an adverse judgment on a jury verdict for $300,000 for its negligent destruction by fire of Glenn and Janice Thompson's barn. A proper measure of damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Phillips v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Falcone v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Thompson v. King Feed & Nutrition Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API