Legal Opinion
GONZALEZ v. PUROLITE CORPORATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02983Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARLOS GONZALES, : : Plaintiff, : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : NO. 17-2983 PUROLITE CORPORATION, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Tucker, J. September __9th_, 2019 Before the Court is Defendant Purolite Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff Carlos Gonzalez’s Response in Opposition (ECF No. 16), and Defendant’s Reply (ECF No. 18). Upon careful consideration of the Parties’ submissions and exhibits, and for the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.