Legal Opinion

Swan v. Gregory

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by William S. Swan against William B. Gregory and Benjamin S. Boyce for a balance of the purchase price of certain stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case is brought here by writ of error. In view of the assignments of error it is desirable to quote from the charge of the trial judge:

“Gentlemen of the jury: In,this cause W. F. Swan in his own behalf and as assignee of A. D. Coffin and the estate of Thomas. Henish is suing W. B. Gregory *458and Benjamin S. Boyce for an amount of money claimed to be due from the defendant to himself and his assignors as a balance of a purchase price of a certain number of shares of stock, 240 shares, in the Maumee Paper Company, growing out of a transaction alleged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Bouma v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hotchin v. SecorMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jennison v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stadler v. CiprianMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mikolas v. Val Blatz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Koppitz-Melchers, Inc. v. KoppitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People Ex Rel. P. Koenig Coal Co. v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Plas v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API