Legal Opinion
Dumas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1939No. Nos. 1729, 1735, 1736PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
These are actions to recover upon policies of war risk insurance.
The facts are these:
Cause No. 1729
George W. Hill entered the military service of the United States on May 14, 1918, and was honorably discharged February 8, 1919. While in the service he applied for and received a $10,000 policy of war risk insurance. Mary I. Hill was designated as beneficiary therein.
On October 26, 1929, and prior to the running of the statute of limitations, Mary I. Hill, acting as guardian for George W. Hill, commenced an action in the District Court of the United States for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hawkins v. Scottish Union & National Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Richards v. Maryland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Denton v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Moody v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ross v. Kelsey Hayes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Valley Vista Development Corp. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- De Motts v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1952
- Derrin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.