Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

H. C. Lindsly & Son v. Kansas City Viaduct & Terminal Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.- — Hon. Jas. E. Goodrich, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action on contract to recover the reasonable value of work and labor performed by plaintiffs in the construction of the Inter*222City Viaduct connecting the cities of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas. The answer is a general denial and a plea of no considerátion. A trial to a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $3011.05, the amount claimed in the petition, and the cause is here on the'appeal- of defendant.

In April, 1905, the defendant, the Kansas City Viaduct and Terminal Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as the Viaduct Company) entered into a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Ritenour v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  5. Hill Bros. v. Bank of SenecaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Const. Co. v. Republic Creosoting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Schaefer v. Brunswick Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Thompson v. Baltimore & OR Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. Lebrecht v. New State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API