Legal Opinion

Cleveland-Arvin v. Cleveland

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1950No. 8897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:

This is an action to quiet title. The rival claimants are mother and daughter. The daughter, who is the plaintiff and respondent, bases her claim to the property upon a deed allegedly executed and delivered to her by her mother. She claims to be “the owner, in possession and entitled to the immediate possession” of the real estate. The mother, who is the defendant and appellant, filed a cross-complaint asking that her title be quieted as against the plaintiff. Each party requests that the court restrain the other from asserting any claim to the property or in any manner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Aronow v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hayes v. MoffattMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Carnahan v. GuptonMontana Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bond v. BirkMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Daugherty v. DaughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API