Raymond Heartless, Inc. v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILLY, Justice:
Defendants were convicted by a Superior Court jury of two counts of obscenity, in violation of 11 Del.C. § 1361, for knowingly possessing and selling a magazine entitled “Lollitots” which depicts nude or partially nude young girls in various poses which graphically focus upon their genitalia. On appeal, defendants contend that the Trial Court erred in denying their motion for a continuance due to the absence of counsel and, as a result, that defendants were denied their right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- In Re KennedySupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.