Legal Opinion
Milton v. Perceptual Development Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1997No. B101202PublishedCited by 18 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GODOY PEREZ, J.
Perceptual Development Corporation, Robert Men and Helen Men appeal from orders vacating the dismissal of the complaint against them and vacating the defaults and default judgments entered against the various parties named as cross-defendants to their responsive cross-complaint. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm those orders.
Facts and Procedural History
Respondent Dr. Robert E. Milton (Milton) sued appellants Perceptual Development Corporation (PDC), Robert Men and Helen Men in a complaint filed October 26, 1992, alleging fraud and securities law violations in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Cisneros v. VueveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Metropolitan Service Corp. v. Casa De Palms, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cline v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Lang v. HochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- SJP Limited Partnership v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Benedict v. PressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.