Legal Opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 9, 2016No. Nos. 4D13-4351, 4D14-146PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing
WARNER, J.
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.
Crane Co. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. appeal from an adverse jury verdict in favor of Richard DeLisle in which the jury found that both appellants’ products containing asbestos were substantial contributing causes to appellee DeLisle’s mesothelioma and awarded substantial damages. Crane primarily argues that the court erred in not excluding expert causation testimony, in denying its motion for directed verdict, and in excluding Fa-bre1…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- GLORIA PATRICIA SANCHEZ and BODY & SOUL RETREAT, LLC. v. JOHANA CINQUE and VONCENT CINQUEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp. v. BrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Etc. v. BrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- David M. Baricko v. Barnett Transportation, Inc. and York Risk etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.