United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This appeal of the Indian Claims Commission’s interlocutory order of February 15, 1974, raises essentially the ques*237tion whether by the Act of February 28, 1877, 19 Stat. .254, and otherwise, the United States took the Sioux Nation’s property in the Black Hills, South Dakota, by the power of eminent domain, or by a course of unfair and dishonorable dealing not amounting to a constitutional taking. In the former case interest is awardable as a part of just.compensation and that is the answer of the Commission. In the.latter it is not, and that is ours. Appellant admitted on oral argument it was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Sioux Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- United States v. Sioux TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.