Birson v. Decatur Transfer and Storage, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
This controversy arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and was begun by a verified complaint as authorized by § 302, Tit. 26, Code of Alabama, 1940. Defendant filed verified answer. The Circuit Court, Jefferson County, after hearing the evidence, entered judgment denying the plaintiff, Birson, recovery of benefits and he seeks review here by certiorari as authorized by the statute.
Petitioner’s complaint alleged that petitioner was an employee of respondent, that both petitioner and respondent were subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of Alabama; that petitioner…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. BurtchSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Defense Ordinance Corporation v. EnglandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Leach Manufacturing Company v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Harris v. National Truck ServiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Henderson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Pinkney v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.