Legal Opinion

Willingham v. United Ins. Co. of America

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 30, 1993No. 1911937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vera and Roger Willingham appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, United Insurance Company of America and its agents Wayne Hester and Mark Ross. The Willinghams sued United, Hester, and Ross, alleging fraud, breach of contract, negligence, conversion, and unjust enrichment. In their brief, however, the Willinghams make arguments only with regard to the fraud and conversion claims. Accordingly, the summary judgment with regard to the other claims is affirmed. Rule 28, A.R.App.P.

A summary judgment is proper when the motion and the materials submitted in support thereof, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lee v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Harmon v. Motors Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Waddell & Reed, Inc. v. UNITED INVEST. LIFE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Boswell v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. TunstallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Alderman v. Inmar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API