Legal Opinion
Provisioners Frozen Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1976No. 75-2335PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge. * PER CURIAM:
This petition for review is from orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) denying two applications by Provisioners Frozen Express, Inc. (Provisioners) for extensions of its permit MC 117588. The applications sought Certificates of public convenience and necessity authorizing operations as a motor vehicle common carrier of specified food items in named western states.
The principal stockholders and directors of petitioner are L. R. Pollart and his wife. Mr. Pollart, the president, has been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
3Cited by22 opinions
- Impro Products, Inc. v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Friends of Sierra Railroad, Inc. And Tuolumne Park and Recreation District v. Interstate Commerce Commission United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- California Association of the Physically Handicapped, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Cities of Newark, New Castle and Seaford, Delaware v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.