Legal Opinion

Pigford v. Veneman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 17, 2002No. CIV.A. 97-1978(PLF), CIV.A. 98-1693(PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

The Court has before it plaintiffs’ motion to endow arbitrators with discretion to extend arbitration deadlines, a joinder in the motion filed by Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP and defendant’s oppositions to both filings. Based on the parties’ written arguments, the Consent Decree and the history of this case, the Court will GRANT plaintiffs’ motion for the following reasons.

Under the Consent Decree that settled this case, the parties agreed that the Arbitrator, Michael Lewis, would conduct hearings to decide all claims for relief under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Captain Stewart W. Beckett v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. Hammon v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Pigford, Timothy C. v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Pigford, Timothy C. v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. Pigford, Timothy v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Pigford, Timothy v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API