Legal Opinion
Pigford v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 8, 2004No. CIV.A.97-1978 PLF, CIV.A.98-1693 PLFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Claimants’ Submission Pursuant to the Court’s January 14, 2003 Request Seeking Clarification that the Court of Appeals’ June 21, 2002 Opinion Applies to Claimants Not Previously Represented by Class Counsel. On April 4, 2003, the Court gave leave for nine claimants to file an additional submission on this issue. On June 25, 2003, those claimants filed Nine Named and or Lead Plaintiffs’ Memorandum: Submitted in Response to the Court’s January 14th 2003 Order. Upon consideration of claimants’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Sabbagh v. United Arab EmiratesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pigford v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Abrams v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- White v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Abrams v. SchafferDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018