Legal Opinion

Pigford, Timothy C. v. Veneman, Ann M.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 21, 2002No. 02-5052 & 02-5053Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The question presented in this appeal concerns a district court’s authority to interpret or modify a consent decree — here, the settlement of a class action brought by over 20,000 African-American farmers charging the United States Department of Agriculture with racial discrimination in lending practices. Due to class counsel’s failure — “bordering on legal malpractice,” the district court, called it — to meet critical consent decree deadlines, the district court interpreted the decree to allow extension of such deadlines…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API