Pigford, Timothy C. v. Veneman, Ann M.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
The question presented in this appeal concerns a district court’s authority to interpret or modify a consent decree — here, the settlement of a class action brought by over 20,000 African-American farmers charging the United States Department of Agriculture with racial discrimination in lending practices. Due to class counsel’s failure — “bordering on legal malpractice,” the district court, called it — to meet critical consent decree deadlines, the district court interpreted the decree to allow extension of such deadlines…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.