Melnick v. Bank of Highwood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Melnick appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff bank’s action to domesticate a judgment obtained via a confession of judgment clause in a promissory note executed by Melnick. Defendant also appeals from a denial of his motion for summary judgment. Held:
1. It is alleged the court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment "because no evidence of Illinois Law was submitted to the trial court demonstrating the validity in that state of a confession judgment.” Addressing the enumeration directly on the issue specified — there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Heakes v. HeakesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Lurey v. JOS. S. COHEN & SONS CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Tarver v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Dropkin v. DropkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank South, N.A. v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Southeastern Metal Products, Inc. v. HorgerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Tandy Computer Leasing v. BENNETT'S SERVICE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Van Buskirk v. Great American BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Maxwell v. Columbia Realty VentureCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.