Legal Opinion

Melnick v. Bank of Highwood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1979No. 58131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Melnick appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff bank’s action to domesticate a judgment obtained via a confession of judgment clause in a promissory note executed by Melnick. Defendant also appeals from a denial of his motion for summary judgment. Held:

1. It is alleged the court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment "because no evidence of Illinois Law was submitted to the trial court demonstrating the validity in that state of a confession judgment.” Addressing the enumeration directly on the issue specified — there…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Heakes v. HeakesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Lurey v. JOS. S. COHEN & SONS CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Tarver v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Dropkin v. DropkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank South, N.A. v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Southeastern Metal Products, Inc. v. HorgerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Tandy Computer Leasing v. BENNETT'S SERVICE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Van Buskirk v. Great American BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Maxwell v. Columbia Realty VentureCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API