Legal Opinion

Heakes v. Heakes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1924No. Nos. 3940, 3975PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition as a whole. It was not subject to the general demurrer on the ground “that said petition sets forth no cause of action in favor of said plaintiff against this defendant.” Conceding, for the present purposes, that suit on the chancery decree of Alabama, *867purely as a suit ou a. foreign judgment, was barred by the statute of limitations under the Civil Code (1910), § 4354, the petition also sought a recovery based on the obligation of the defendant to pay to the plaintiff $75 per month, which obligation was founded on the chancery decree..…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Arrington v. Arrington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. DeUprey v. DeUpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McGill v. McGillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Lockwood v. BarefieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Bryant v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. McLendon v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. McLendon v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API