Legal Opinion

Bank South, N.A. v. Howard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1994No. S93G1658PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Presiding Justice.

Bank South sued Howard on a guaranty which contained a provision in which Howard purported to waive the right to a jury trial in any action on the guaranty. Based on that provision, the trial court struck Howard’s demand for jury trial. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment, holding that a valid waiver of jury trial must be knowing and voluntary, and that since Howard could not have known when he signed the guaranty contract what the basis and circumstances of a future claim on the guaranty might be, his waiver could not have been knowing and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manderson & Associates, Inc. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Information Buying Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Weyant v. MacIntyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Thomas v. BloodworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Melnick v. Bank of HighwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Poole v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  4. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. In Re Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API