Eleftherios Michael Pistentis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The major question presented in this petition to review a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is whether the Board properly interpreted the investor regulation when it affirmed an immigration law judge’s determination that Eleftherios M. Pistentis, a Cypriot national, had failed to qualify for an investor exemption from the labor certification requirement. 1 We grant the petition, vacate the Board’s order, and remand the case for further proceedings.
I
Pistentis, the petitioner, entered the United States on August 29, 1975 as a non-immigrant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Heitland v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Madhukant Jinabhai Mehta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- HEITLANDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
- KOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Masoa Konishi v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981