Legal Opinion

Joseph Di Biase v. SPX Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 28, 2017No. 15-2340PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Judge Keenan joined.

GREGORY, Chief Judge:

The individual plaintiffs, retirees of SPX Corporation (“SPX”), their spouses and eligible dependents, and their labor union, the International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW (“UAW”), (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for preliminary injunction. Because we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Plaintiffs failed to satisfy the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. Lackey v. StinnieSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  2. Marvin Miranda v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  5. Robert Frazier v. Prince George's County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API