Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Burtch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1989No. 4161PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This is a disciplinary proceeding against Aberdeen attorney Jack L. Burtch, admitted in 1955. The hearing officer entered 113 findings of fact and 12 conclusions of law. The findings and conclusions establish: (1) three violations of RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate fees); (2) six violations of RPC 1.3 and 3.2 (lack of diligence and failure to expedite litigation); (3) two violations of RPC 1.4 (failure to keep client fully informed); (4) two violations of RPC 1.15(d) (failure to return client documents and unearned fees); (5) one violation of RLD 13.3 (failure to timely file trust account…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against YatesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. LaBrec v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against KageleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API