Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Petersen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1993No. 10313PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This matter is before the court upon its direction to Respondent Richard A. Petersen, an attorney at law, to show cause why he should not be disbarred, contrary to a recommendation by a majority of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association for a suspension for 2 years followed by probation for 2 years. We disagree with the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board and order that respondent be disbarred.

Question Presented

The sole question in this case is whether the appropriate sanction for Respondent Petersen should be disbarment instead of the 2-year suspension and 2-year…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. IN re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API