In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Petersen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This matter is before the court upon its direction to Respondent Richard A. Petersen, an attorney at law, to show cause why he should not be disbarred, contrary to a recommendation by a majority of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association for a suspension for 2 years followed by probation for 2 years. We disagree with the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board and order that respondent be disbarred.
Question Presented
The sole question in this case is whether the appropriate sanction for Respondent Petersen should be disbarment instead of the 2-year suspension and 2-year…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- IN re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.