Legal Opinion
Alcantar v. Sanchez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 2011No. 28,436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
{1} This appeal presents issues relating to the garnishment of funds held in a joint bank account. The district court awarded summary judgment in favor of the bank. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
{2} Our standard of review is well settled. “Summary judgment is appropriate where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Self v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 1998-NMSC-046, ¶ 6,126 N.M. 396, 970 P.2d 582. “In determining…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Juneau v. Intel Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Presbyterian Healthcare Services v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Thompson v. PotterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- WAS, LLC v. Coll (In re DC Energy, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- MRC Permian Company and Joe Foran v. Three Rivers Operating Company and Three Rivers Acquisition LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.