Miller v. Multiplex Faucet Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.
Plaintiff, Frank Miller, had verdict and judgment for $15,000 against defendant, Multiplex Faucet Company, which defendant as third-party plaintiff had verdict and judgment for a like amount against third- party defendant, Fred Bryant. Defendant and third-party defendant have appealed.
Defendant-appellant Multiplex contends that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed verdict; and that the amount of the jury’s award is excessive. Third-party defendant-appellant Bryant joins in these contentions.
At plaintiff’s request the trial court had…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adelsberger v. SheehySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Zichler v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Higgins v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Goslin v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Sparks v. AuslanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hamilton v. SloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Begley v. Adaber Realty & Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Bone v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. CurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.