Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Berry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1934No. 31240PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellant was plaintiff in the court below and sued out a writ of replevin for certain property sold by him to the appellee for the conduct of a beauty shop in Houston, Mississippi. The affidavit of replevin alleged that the property was wrongfully detained by Miss Pearl Berry in district No. 1 for the election of justices of the peace in Chickasaw county, and gave the items of property and the value of each item separately.

There was proof that demand was made for the property, and the writ of replevin appears to have been introduced as well as the bond given for the forthcoming of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Furst v. PeaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tolbert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Green v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Poteete v. City of Water ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API