Legal Opinion
Vukelic v. Bartz
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 24, 2003No. Al-01-146PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
This dispute arose out of actions alleged to have been taken by the defendants, Darleen Bartz and Murray Sagsveen, against the plaintiff, Pamela J. Vukelic, while working for the North Dakota Department of Health [hereinafter referred to as the Health Department]. According to the plaintiff [hereinafter referred to as Vukelic], she was removed from her position as the Health Department’s Director of the Division of Disease Control on May 31, 2000, under the guise of a departmental reorganization. Thereafter, Vukelic claims that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kathy Davison v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Kathy Davison v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Rocco Forte, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Kathy Davison v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Rocco Forte, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007