Legal Opinion
Henegar v. Banta
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 1, 1993No. 3:92CV7152PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. POTTER, Senior District Judge:
This cause is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs opposition. A former brakeman with Norfolk and Western Railway Company, plaintiff was allegedly defamed by his supervisor who claimed that Mr. Henegar gave false and conflicting statements regarding an injury that occurred on February 4, 1991.
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenneth D. Henegar v. William M. BantaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Harris v. HirshNew York Court of Appeals · 1994