Legal Opinion
Zaversnik v. Union Pac. R.
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided May 9, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 3139PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T. BLAKE KENNEDY, District Judge.
This is a suit brought under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, Title 50, U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 301 to 308, in which it is sought to require the defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to restore the plaintiffs to the position of car-men as of the date which they would have completed their 1160 days of employment as temporary carmen had they not entered the military service of the United States. The.suit is being presented by the United States Attorney at the request of the plaintiffs, without cost to them, under the provisions of the Act.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Spearmon v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Huffman v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1947
- Seattle Star, Inc. v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrison G. Travis v. Schwartz Manufacturing Co., a Corp., Harrison G. Travis v. Schwartz Manufacturing Co., a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956