Legal Opinion

State v. Garland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1911No. 9624PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered February 25, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— The defendant was' convicted of the crime of grand larceny. He appeals from a judgment pronounced upon the verdict of a jury.

It appears that this is the second trial of the case upon the same state of facts. The defendant was found guilty upon the first trial, but upon his motion, the court granted a new trial. The reason for granting this motion does not appear from the record, but appellant states that the motion “was granted because of fatal variance and other reasons.” Thereafter the prosecuting attorney filed another information as follows, omitting the formal parts:

“The said William…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. StraubWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. QuinnWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. GileWashington Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NilnchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. GraeberWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Aberdeen v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API