Legal Opinion

L. Nachman & Son, Inc. v. E. Lasner, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 5, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of an Examiner-in-Chief of the United States Patent Office, acting for the Commissioner of Patents, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing an opposition by appellant to an application by appellee for registration of the word “Swirlaway” as a trademark for fur scarves intended for the use of women and girls. The opposition was based on appellant’s ownership and use of the registered mark “Swirl” as a trademark for “Women’s And Misses’ Textile Aprons” and for “Women’s And Girls’ Wrap-Around Aprons.”

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Desmond'sCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Princess Pat, Ltd. v. Joseph TursiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  3. Carlisle Shoe Company v. Societe Anonyme: Roger Fare & CieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. Johnson & Johnson v. Veon Chemical CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API