Johnson & Johnson v. Veon Chemical Corporation
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Appellant, as owner of numerous registrations of its mark “PERMACEL”, 1 opposed registration of appellee-applicant’s mark “PERMA LINE”, application Serial Number 51,833, filed May 16, 1958, for a “Thermoplastic Road Marking Compound”. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in dismissing the opposition, concluded “that the differences between the marks are sufficient to obviate any reasonable likelihood of confusion or mistake or deception of purchasers”. Opposer has appealed.
We shall first consider the similarities of the two marks, PERMACEL and PERMA LINE. We agree with appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Foley & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- West Disinfecting Co. v. Lan-O-Sheen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Application of MyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Spiegel Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- L. Nachman & Son, Inc. v. E. Lasner, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Coca-Cola Company v. William C. Clay, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- The Coca-Cola Company v. William C. Clay, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963