Legal Opinion
Carlisle Shoe Company v. Societe Anonyme: Roger Fare & Cie
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 24, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6553PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, acting for the Commissioner, reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, and dismissing appellant’s opposition to appellee’s application for registration of a composite mark comprising a plume and thistle background design together with the words “Le Gant Mademoiselle,” as a trademark for gloves made of leather, fabric, and combinations thereof. The opposition is based on appellant’s ownership of a long prior registration, No. 346,290, dated May 18, 1937, of “Mademoiselle” as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- General Shoe Corporation v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- In Re Keller, Heumann & Thompson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- General Shoe Corporation v. Hollywood-Maxwell CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- L. Nachman & Son, Inc. v. E. Lasner, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mushroom Makers, Incorporated v. R. G. Barry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mushroom Makers, Inc. v. R. G. Barry Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart Schaffner & MarxDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- General Foods Corporation v. E-Z Spuds, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963