Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. 2; Appeal, No. 170PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This appeal grows out of the same improvement referred to in No. 163, April Term, 1922, [the preceding case] but raises an entirely different question. By agreement with the Borough of Freeport, and with the approval of the Public Service Commission, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company elevated its tracks in said borough and, in doing so, constructed an embankment about eighteen feet high, supported by a concrete wall along either side of its right-of-way. By the terms of the agreement certain streets which formerly crossed the railroad tracks at grade were vacated, wholly…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mayor of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Quicksall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. County of Chester v. BrowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Spang & Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hedrick v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Hoffer v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Locust Street Subway ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Apple v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API