Legal Opinion

Apple v. City of Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1931No. Appeal 131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexier, P. J.,

This suit arises out of the abolition of a grade crossing. Ridge Avenue at the scene of the improvement ran approximately north and south and passed in succession at right angles the following intersecting streets: Osborn, Kalos and Sumac and further on crossed at grade the Reading Railroad. The situation may be visualized if we bear in mind the order in which these streets intersect Ridge Avenue. Plaintiff’s house was at the southeast corner of the Kalos Street intersection. In making the improvement, Ridge Avenue was deflected to the west at Osborn Street forming a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Spang & Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Hedrick v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Holmes v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Ruscomb StreetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RichardsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Department of Highways AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Fecher v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API