Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
Neither the Court of Appeals nor this Court has heretofore been called upon to decide whether Maryland shall follow the strict or conversion rule, the moderate or minor deviation rule, or the liberal rule, in construing the omnibus clause of automobile insurance policies. The appellate courts of this State have not had that issue put squarely to them so that there has been no need to favor any particular rule over another. This appeal, however, calls upon us to take a stand as to which route we shall hereafter journey in interpreting omnibus clauses.
The factual setting from which the issue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Metz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. PinkneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Patterson Agency, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977