Morgan v. Hays
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentStruckmeyer, Justice
The majority, in reaffirming the holding in State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Pressley, 74 Ariz. 412, 250 P.2d 992, have compounded the error initiated by the language used in S. H. Kress & Co. v. Superior Court, 66 Ariz. 67, 182 P.2d 931 (1947). The error now results in denying petitioner the right to trial by jury guaranteed by Article 2, § 23 of the Constitution, A.R.S. of this state.
PETITIONER’S RIGHT TO SUE
By Article 18, § 6 of the Constitution of Arizona, adopted at statehood in 1912, employees were guaranteed a right of action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.