Legal Opinion

United States v. Javier Torrez-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 22, 1980No. 79-1155PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from a probation revocation raises two issues, first, whether the trial judge violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure when he accepted a guilty plea from defendant-appellant who was Spanish speaking and did not understand English; and second, whether the court erred in revoking defendant’s probation on the basis of his misrepresentation that he had no prior convictions. Because we hold that defendant may not collaterally attack his underlying conviction at a probation revocation hearing, we do not reach the merits of defendant’s Rule 11…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. John Andrew DaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Frank David FrancischineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. James David RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. John Allan CrawleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Jesus Zambrana, Sr., Charles Cole and Jay ZambranaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API