People v. Garlotte
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
Defendant, Irwin H. Garlotte, appeals the trial court order revoking his conditional release and ordering his return to the Colorado State Hospital. He contends that §§ 16-8-115.5, C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.) and 16 — 8— 102(4.5), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) are unconstitutional insofar as they allow revocation of a conditional release and the recommitment of an insanity acquittee based solely on the violation of a condition of release. We reject his contention but remand for further proceedings.
As a result of an October 1984 incident, defendant was charged with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. StreanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. OglethorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. DashColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. PlattWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Vashone-Caruso v. SuthersColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.