Hill v. Thompson & Knight

HECHT, Justice.

Appellee Thompson & Knight sued appellant Roy W. Hill on a promissory note and obtained a summary judgment for $28,-955.77 plus interest and costs. We overrule Hill’s three points of error, affirm the judgment of the trial court and, because we determine that Hill has taken this appeal for delay and without sufficient cause, award Thompson & Knight additional damages of $1,500.00.

In his first point of error Hill contends that summary judgment is improper because Thompson & Knight did not establish that it is the present owner, holder and possessor of the note. The affidavit of…