Nicklisson v. Holman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Fh’ror from Franklin District Court. The facts, and the errors complained of, are sufficiently-stated in the opinion. Holman and Holman, as plaintiffs, had judgment at the November Term 1874, and Nioklisson, defendant, brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Lucy F. Holman and her husband C. Holman against Israel Nicklisson, to set aside a certain sale and conveyance of real estate made by them to him. The title to said real estate was in Mrs. Holman, and she through her agents C. Holman and J. *23R. Hibbard sold the same to said Nicklisson, and then she with her husband executed a proper deed for the premises to Nicklisson. The action was tried by the court, without a jury. The court found generally in favor of the plaintiffs, and against the defendant, and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Despain v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. InglittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Westerman v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
- Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943