Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Midland Constructors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1964No. 39282PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Relators, Midland Constructors, Inc., and Zurich American Insurance Company, as employer and insurer respectively, seek review of an order of the Industrial Commission awarding workmen’s compensation to the employee-respondent, John H. Hubbard. Hubbard was totally and permanently disabled while working on an electric transmission line in Marion, South Dakota. At the time of the accident he was a Minnesota resident employed by an Illinois corporation whose business was localized in Dodge Center, Minnesota.
The only issue is whether the employer’s business was also localized in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hagberg v. Colonial & Pacific Frigidways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Carey v. StadtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Spratlin v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.