Legal Opinion

Strickland v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 26, 2004No. 03-1390CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BRADEN, Judge.

RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On July 30, 2004, the court issued an opinion and final judgment denying defendant (“the Government”)’s January 15, 2004 motion for summary judgment on the administrative record. The court, however, granted plaintiff's February 24, 2004 cross-motion, in accord with an October 10, 2002 Board for Corrections of Naval Records (“BCNR”) decision, affirming an April 5,1999 Administrative Discharge Board decision to separate plaintiff from the Department of the Navy (“Navy”),…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael Strickland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Strickland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Strickland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Strickland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API