Legal Opinion

Kirk v. VIM Properties

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 1, 2020No. 120888Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 120,888 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DAVID KIRK, Appellee, v. VIM PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant, GREGORY V. BLUME, Appellant, and CHRISTINE I. MILLER, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson District Court; DAVID W. HAUBER, judge. Opinion filed May 1, 2020. Affirmed. Gregory V. Blume, appellant pro se. Richard D. Dvorak, of Dvorak Law, Chartered, of Overland Park, for appellees. Before POWELL, P.J., HILL and STANDRIDGE, JJ. PER CURIAM: David Kirk, a member of VIM Properties, LLC (VIM), filed a claim for damages and injunctive relief…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Friedman v. Kansas State Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API