Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 15, 2013No. 102,921PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Per Curiam,-.
In this appeal, Dr. Amir Friedman asks us to reverse an order of the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Board) in which the Board revoked his license to practice medicine and surgery in the state of Kansas. Friedman presents several issues, including a threshold question of whether the Board had jurisdiction to initiate a revocation proceeding after Friedman’s license expired. On this threshold issue, we hold the Board had jurisdiction to revoke Friedman’s license to practice medicine and surgery because Friedman was practicing medicine…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pork Motel, Corp. v. Kansas Department of Health & EnvironmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Redd v. Kansas Truck CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- McCain Foods USA, Inc. v. Central Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per CuriamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- In Re Interests A.A.-F.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.