Legal Opinion

Tate v. West Norriton Township

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil 06-CV-4068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

RUFE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Donte Tate (“Plaintiff’ or “Tate”) brings this action against Defendants West Norriton Township (“Township”) and Patrolman W.J. Delaney (“Patrolman Delaney”) (Defendants collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that they violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as certain state laws, during his arrest in September 2004. Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmer v. DeckerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Clifton v. Borough of EddystoneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Ward v. NoonanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Castro v. DebiasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. LUGO v. DEANGELODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API