Legal Opinion

Texas Optometry Board v. Lee Vision Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1974No. 4713PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

The Texas Optometry Board entered orders suspending for five days the “Advertising Permits” of Lee Vision Center, Inc. and Terminal Hudson Realty Corp., after finding that the parties violated Section 5.-10, paragraphs (e), (f), (j) and (k), of Article 4552, the Texas Optometry Act, Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., (Supp. 1969). Lee Vision Center and Terminal Hudson Realty filed suit against the Board alleging that Section 5.10 of the Texas Optometry Act was unconstitutional. The trial court found that the Board’s orders were supported by substantial evidence, but that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Martine v. BD. OF REGENTS, STATE SR. COLLEGES, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Saenz Motors v. Big H. Auto Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API