Legal Opinion

HOUTSMA V. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided April 8, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00328Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION JOHN HOUTSMA, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-328-AW-GRJ STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _______________________________/ ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 PETITION I have considered the magistrate judge’s January 27, 2020 Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 15 (R&R). No objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation concludes the petition should be dismissed, and I agree. John Houtsma filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Houtsma has been civilly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. CossSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Daniel Clark Medberry v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API