Hartz v. Hilsendegen
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Van Zile, J. Bill by- John C. Hartz against Louis Hilsendegen and others for reformation of a lease. From a decree for defendants, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause was filed for the purpose of obtaining a decree to reform a certain lease bearing date March 25, 1905, between Elizabeth Hilsendegen of the first part and John C. Hartz of the second part, purporting to let and lease certain store premises in the city of Detroit to said Hartz for the term of ten years from and after the 1st day of May, 1905, so as to disclose the real lessors thereof to be the estate of Valentine Hilsendegen, deceased, and to be for the use and benefit of the widow, - said Elizabeth' Hilsendégen, and the residuary legatees, Louis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Ryder v. FlandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Quick v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Wettlaufer v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Ann Arbor Savings Bank v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrington v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Mintz v. HartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Ross Properties v. ShengMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986