Legal Opinion
People v. Petrovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1924No. Crim. No. 743PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted on an information charging him with having on or about the third day of July, 1923, in the county of Sacramento, state of California, unlawfully sold two bottles of wine contrary to the provisions of what is commonly known as the Wright Act of the state of California (Stats. 1921, p. 79). The defendant’s motion for a new trial being denied, he prosecutes this appeal therefrom and also from the judgment of conviction in said cause.
As grounds for reversal the defendant alleges improper admission of testimony, erroneous instructions and illegality of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. . BoyntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Craig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- State v. LipmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.